Henry James Sr., Horace Greeley, and Stephen Pearl Andrews

Love, Marriage, and Divorce

AND

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE INDIVIDUAL

A Discussion

BETWEEN

HENRY JAMES, HORACE GREELEY, and STEPHEN PEARL ANDREWS:

INCLUDING

The Final Replies of Mr. Andrews,

REJECTED BY THE TRIBUNE.

EDITED BY STEPHEN PEARL ANDREWS
(1853)

[revised subtitle in 2nd edition:]

INCLUDING THE FINAL REPLIES OF MR. ANDREWS, REJECTED BY THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE,
AND A SUBSEQUENT DISCUSSION, OCCURRING TWENTY YEARS LATER, BETWEEN MR. JAMES AND MR. ANDREWS
(1889)

by Henry James, Sr. (1811-1882), Horace Greeley (1811-1872)
and Stephen Pearl Andrews (1812-1886)

Introductory Chapter by Stephen Pearl Andrews

Discussion

I. Mr. James’ Reply to THE OBSERVER
II. Queries to Mr. James, by Mr. Andrews
III. Mr. Greeley’s Comments
IV. Extract of Reply of Mr. James to THE OBSERVER
V. Mr. Greeley’s Comments
VI. Notice by Mr. Greeley
VII. Mr. Andrews’ Reply to Mr. James and Mr. Greeley
VIII. Mr. Greeley’s Reply to the Foregoing
IX. Mr. James’s Reply
X. Mr. Andrews’ Reply to Mr. Greeley, Rejected by THE TRIBUNE
XI. Mr. Andrews’ Reply to Mr. James, Rejected by THE TRIBUNE
XII. A Parthian Arrow by Mr. Greeley
XIII. Reply by Mr. Andrews
XIV. Strictures on an Article from Henry James in THE NEW YORK TRIBUNE of Feb. 12, 1853

Chapters Added to Second Edition

XV. A Letter from Mr. James to H. Y. R.
XVI. A Letter from H. Y. R. to Mr. Andrews
XVII. Comments by Mr. Andrews
XVIII. Letter from Mr. James to Mr. Andrews
XIX. Comments and Reply by Mr. Andrews

Appendix to First Edition

I. EQUITABLE COMMERCE, by Josiah Warren: A Review Attributed to George Ripley
II. EQUITABLE COMMERCE: A Comment by Stephen Pearl Andrews

First Edition: New York: Stringer & Townsend, Publishers. 1853.
Second Edition: Boston, Mass.: Benj. R. Tucker, Publisher. 1889.

[Online editor’s note: where the first and second editions differ in stylistic details of punctuation, capitalisation, etc., the first edition has generally been followed, on the hypothesis that such changes in the second edition (corresponding to Tucker’s own editorial standards in Liberty) owe more to Tucker’s preferences than to Andrews’. – RTL.]

Back to online library